Basic Instinct: Violence in the Soul

(Reprinted from orig­i­nal pub­li­ca­tion in the Gorean Voice magazine)

Ah, vio­lence, how our mod­ern soci­ety claims to abhor it! It is blamed for a mul­ti­tude of ills in the world, every­thing from teen mass mur­ders to the qui­eter, more intense nature of the psy­cho­path­ic ser­i­al killer on the loose. Road rage on our high­ways and gang killings across the world. And lets not for­get about war… naked vio­lence with­out pre­tense, the great­est of evils. Violence is deplored in the arts, in the movies, in the school yards, it is den­i­grat­ed as a rel­ic of a pre­vi­ous, less civ­i­lized time.

In the past, soci­eties dealt more direct­ly with vio­lence. They more com­mon­ly under­stood that vio­lence can­not be expunged from the human psy­che, but rather must be chan­neled into accept­able forums, or unleashed pro­duc­tive­ly in bat­tle. Violence was noth­ing to be ashamed of unless it was uncon­trolled, a per­son reduced past rea­son to ani­mal­is­tic response.

There are numer­ous exam­ples of how vio­lence was han­dled in past soci­eties. The Roman are­nas with their glad­i­a­to­r­i­al con­tests, the spec­ta­cle of blood sport between ani­mals, man and ani­mals, and final­ly, man against man, with the crowds scream­ing and cheer­ing. The Spanish bull fights, man against a goad­ed, angry, and exceed­ing­ly dan­ger­ous ani­mal more than ten times his size. In South America, ancient forms of the game of Jai-Alai fea­tured bro­ken bones and shat­tered teeth in the fren­zy of the play. Human and ani­mal sac­ri­fice was once a com­mon fea­ture of civ­i­liza­tions around the world, entire soci­eties expe­ri­enc­ing reli­gious ecsta­sy as a heart was wrenched still beat­ing from a liv­ing body and held aloft in tri­umph. Public flog­gings that scourged the flesh off a man’s back, hang­ings and behead­ing that were both manda­to­ry to attend and con­sid­ered a source of enter­tain­ment by many, cru­ci­fix­ion which served notice to all passers-by that crim­i­nal activ­i­ty would not be tol­er­at­ed in the town they were about to enter. Massive per­son­al vio­lence turned towards what was thought to be con­struc­tive; a les­son in civic behav­ior, enter­tain­ment for the mass­es, spir­i­tu­al trans­port. Whatever the excuse for it, one pur­pose it always served was to release the vio­lent instincts in the pop­u­la­tion through a con­trolled, small por­tion of that same population.

Perhaps if these things occurred in only a few soci­eties through­out human his­to­ry, if they were local­ized to a par­tic­u­lar region, or even one or two con­ti­nents, it might be more eas­i­ly explained away as aber­rant behav­ior by peo­ple who sim­ply ‘did not know any bet­ter’. However, even a cur­so­ry exam­i­na­tion will show that vio­lence in one form or anoth­er has always been a part of human his­to­ry, in every civ­i­liza­tion, in every region and in every epoch, as far back as we have record.

These days chil­dren are taught that the evil of vio­lence should be sup­pressed, that it is in inher­ent­ly wrong. That it is, in effect, a dirty word for a dirt­i­er act. They are taught not to fight, and that if they must release their vio­lence then it should be through accept­ed means such as sports, or gen­tle com­pe­ti­tion. Perhaps it is no sur­prise in this con­text that some­times the most vir­u­lent vio­lence breaks out from those who had held it in the longest, who had pre­vi­ous­ly been most suc­cess­ful at pre­tend­ing to pacifism.

A ‘paci­fist male’ is a con­tra­dic­tion in terms. Most self-described “paci­fists” are not pacif­ic; they sim­ply assume false col­ors. When the wind changes, they hoist the Jolly Roger.”

- Robert Heinlein, from The Notebooks of Lazarus Long

The leg­endary mild-man­nered Postal work­er who brings loaded weapons to work one sullen morn­ing, boys in a school who can no longer sub­li­mate their teen angst or tol­er­ate bul­lies, the man or woman who comes home with life’s frus­tra­tions dri­ving them to abuse the spouse. Examples go on and on in a parade of tragedy. The caus­es are cit­ed to be any­thing from insan­i­ty to bad child­hoods, from social stress­es to men­tal break­down. Those who arrive at such con­clu­sions are wrong. They speak of trig­gers and think them caus­es, and ignore fun­da­men­tal human nature in the process. The cause is that we are an extreme­ly aggres­sive race, we enjoy our vio­lence, and that vio­lence, like a dammed riv­er at flood time, will find it’s own out­let, one way or anoth­er, soon­er or later.

Yet, our won­drous mod­ern soci­ety does indeed have it’s hypocrisies where the evil of vio­lence is con­cerned. It is sub­li­mat­ed into cor­po­rate take-overs and bru­tal sports such as box­ing, karate, foot­ball, rug­by, and hock­ey, but for many, sports are too dis­tant from the real thing to tru­ly sate the sav­age soul with­in. Most peo­ple claim to hate vio­lence, yet the most con­sis­tent­ly high movie and tele­vi­sion rat­ings go towards two fun­da­men­tal themes; sex, and of course, vio­lence. The films of John Woo and Quentin Tarrantino set new marks for ‘action movies’, the polite euphemism for vio­lent action and, often, out­right com­bat. People cry out at the hor­ror of an acci­dent on the high­way, yet they slow down and cre­ate mas­sive traf­fic jams so that they can indulge in ‘rub­ber-neck­ing’, peer­ing with anx­ious mor­bid­i­ty at the after­math of high-speed vio­lence, hop­ing that in the few sec­onds they are near to the scene a glimpse might be grant­ed to them of twist­ed wreck­age and shat­tered bod­ies. We demand that news cov­er­age includes every pos­si­ble aspect of war; the types and num­bers of weapons, how they are used and what their effects will be, down to the inter­views with the sol­diers in the trench­es, hang­ing on every shakey word. We are riv­et­ed to the screens as we watch the high alti­tude footage of bombs tak­ing out whole city blocks, of mis­siles arc­ing unerr­ing­ly into their tar­gets, and we know the slaugh­ter is whole­sale. Children play at ‘army’, while adults are glued breath­less­ly to their seats view­ing the auto races, with espe­cial atten­tion to the way a car tum­bles out of control.

It is worth remem­ber­ing, also, that not all vio­lence need be phys­i­cal, or with intent to harm, nor need it be upon anoth­er human for it to exist. The vio­lent con­flict of a debate or argu­ment can be just as cut­ting as sharp­ened flint, the claw marks of a wom­an’s pas­sion upon a man’s back even as his hands grip her unto bruis­ing. The vio­lence brought about by hunt­ing and fish­ing as an animal’s life is tak­en for the sport of it. Not so long ago a movie was released which delved into the sex­u­al release found in the vio­lence of car acci­dents, while ‘snuff’ films have long been a part of the under­ground movie scene. Documentaries show­ing nat­ur­al cat­a­stro­phes, or the destruc­tion of build­ings, have their own niche. And final­ly, vio­lence can be done to a soci­ety, by numer­ous means. The bonds of com­mu­ni­ty snapped while the destroy­er smiles with the plea­sure of watch­ing that soci­ety fray and come apart. There are even more jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for vio­lence than there are types of vio­lence itself, but in the final analy­sis on this per­spec­tive, vio­lence is a fun­da­men­tal and per­va­sive real­iza­tion of innate human aggres­sion, and as such, as long as there are humans, it will not be denied.

The Gorean phi­los­o­phy han­dles things a bit dif­fer­ent­ly. Based on age-old pre­cepts of human behav­ior and needs, it works inti­mate­ly with the rela­tion­ship between gen­ders and exhorts us to “be who we real­ly are”. It calls on us to not only under­stand our­selves more ful­ly, but to embrace our pri­mal instincts and find a way to inte­grate all of who and what we are in our real lives. Throughout the series one can find exam­ples of peo­ple find­ing ways to release their vio­lence in ways that are con­sis­tent­ly con­struc­tive with­in their milieu. Gor is a sav­age, untamed world which affords numer­ous oppor­tu­ni­ties for such release, unlike our own fair­ly tame Earth. Yet, humans are still humans, in spite of fun­da­men­tal cel­lu­lar dif­fer­ences between Goreans and Terrans. Much of the books delve into the nature of the Warrior, his Codes and his respons­es to cir­cum­stances, yet a Warrior is still a man, and I can­not help but think that much of what is said will per­tain to all men.

Tears are not unbe­com­ing to the Warrior. The Warrior is a man of deep pas­sions and emo­tions. Many men can­not even under­stand his depths. Do not fear your cur­rents and your pow­ers. In the Warrior are the flow­ers and the storms. Each is a part of him, and each is real. Accept both. Deny neither.”

 — Guardsman of Gor, page 238

Deep pas­sions… all the bar­bar­ic splen­dour of a peo­ple who refuse to bot­tle up their emo­tions, who will not deny them­selves or what is impor­tant to them. This is almost dia­met­ri­cal­ly opposed to our mod­ern soci­etal view­point. At the same time, it is also clear that the nature of the Warrior is not the same as the nature of the Scribe, nor the same as that of a Merchant, that per­haps those are num­bered amongst the “many men” who can­not ful­ly under­stand the way the Warrior releas­es ful­ly his inner vio­lence in per­fect har­mo­ny with who and what he is. The Warrior is unafraid of the furies which some­times rage with­in him.

     “Rings of gold and now insignia of rank, feath­ers and neck­laces, were dis­trib­uted. Once, Bila Huruma lift­ed his hand and said, “Good.” The sol­dier then com­mend­ed would then, I think, rather have died than betray Bila Huruma. Such small things, I think, may be scorned by those who do not under­stand the nature of war or men, and be seen as manip­u­la­tive and laugh­able, and yet such a small com­men­da­tion, when war­rant­ed and sin­cere, is worth more to some men than the mate­r­i­al trea­sures that might move those who hold them­selves their supe­ri­ors. Let each man choose his own trea­sures. The cyn­i­cal, mer­can­tile mind will nev­er under­stand the mind of the sol­dier. The sol­dier has stood with com­rades in arms, and held. I do not think he would exchange that for the con­temp­tu­ous pre­tense to wis­dom of those whom he pro­tects, who would scorn him. He has main­tained his post. But per­haps some, even those who have nev­er marched in the mud, with com­rades, singing, on a clear and windy morn­ing, a spear upon thi­er shoul­der, can under­stand this. Why does the nib­bling urt chat­ter and laugh at the larl? Is it because he him­self is not a larl, or is it because he fears it’s paw?”

 — Explorers of Gor, page 229

A Warrior does not sug­ar-coat vio­lence, he freely acknowl­edges it’s purview and moves with pow­er and pre­ci­sion with­in it’s domain. Consider the Torvaldslander berserk­ers, an extreme case of the release of vio­lence, yet even that wild, uncon­trolled killing rage is per­mit­ted reign by delib­er­ate choice.

My sword is thirsty, it must drink.”

 — Magicians of Gor, page 164

The Gorean phi­los­o­phy knows and under­stands the deep-seat­ed aggres­sion with­in the human psy­che, and explores that with, on occas­sion, cyn­i­cal yet pierc­ing insight. Human nature is not going to go away, and it will not be smoth­ered by the thin veneer of civ­i­liza­tion. The human spir­it is a flame that can fan into a rag­ing bon­fire on a moments notice, and when it does it will seek out­let, it will crave expression.

It is not the killing, for exe­cu­tions would not suffice.”
“No, it is the sport, and the risk, and the killing.”
“One must fight for causes.”
“Causes exist, that men may fight.”

- Guardsman of Gor, page 16

How many have come fresh from see­ing a movie filled with phe­nom­e­nal lev­els of vio­lence, and smiled with con­tent­ment, a feel­ing akin to the after­glow of sex suf­fus­ing your psy­che, sat­ed for a few days or a week through vic­ar­i­ous vio­lence? How many shout and scream as they watch the aggres­sive vio­lence of sports? These things are with us even yet, though we are sep­a­rat­ed by over a thou­sand years from Rome and her are­nas, from the Mayans and their sac­ri­fi­cial offer­ings. The dif­fer­ence is that now, in our soci­ety, we are not sup­posed to acknowl­edge our inner vio­lence, and instead, are expect­ed to some­how, mys­te­ri­ous­ly, expunge it.

Humans are arguably the most aggres­sive land species still extant, and vio­lence is the expres­sion of aggres­sion. Violence is, it seems, uni­ver­sal to humans. In spite of a hun­dred years of polit­i­cal activism, in spite of mil­lenia of the progress in tech­no­log­i­cal and social advance­ment, humans remain fun­da­men­tal­ly fer­al, requir­ing only the right trig­ger to release what lies in wait, with­in. Rather than wait until such a trig­ger comes upon one unseen, per­haps it is bet­ter to find nat­ur­al forms of expres­sion for our nat­ur­al aggres­sion. Instead of view­ing it with hor­ror, under­stand that it is as much a part of who and what we are as our eyes and our arms and our brains. We are not a gen­tle race, we humans. We are con­querors, fierce­ly com­pet­i­tive with our­selves, even when there is an oppo­nent before us, an ene­my to smite, a dan­ger to end.

He who can­not think, is not a man. Yet, nei­ther is he who can only think.”

 — Vagabonds of Gor, page 65

LionHeart
Rarius, Civitatis Port Kar
Intended of Nyre
Copyright © March 2000, Lionheart

What did you think of this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *