On Contract Slavery I

(Reprinted from orig­i­nal pub­li­ca­tion in the Gorean Voice magazine)

There are many on-line-isms which lit­ter the on-line venues of Gor, some are nat­ur­al out­growths of the tech­ni­cal aspect of the medi­um itself, while oth­ers are con­se­quences of the Net’s abil­i­ty to spread ideas, both good and bad, with astound­ing rapid­i­ty through­out the world. Both con­cepts and mis­con­cep­tions, under­stand­ings and mis­un­der­stand­ings, spread like wild­fire until a short time lat­er, they are so preva­lent in only a few months that they have become entrenched fea­tures of the cyber­scape, and from there, enter the minds of men and women through their com­put­er mon­i­tors. They have become a part of the on-line Gorean par­a­digm, right or wrong, and as new peo­ple come on-board, they are tak­en for grant­ed as being ‘right’, or ‘the way it should be’, and the need for fur­ther thought and con­sid­er­a­tion is sel­dom applied.

One of those con­cepts which paints the cyber­scape with it’s tints is the inter­est­ing idea that a woman, once a slave, is always a slave. The con­cept is handy, and sim­pli­fies on-line inter­ac­tions, as well cre­at­ing a con­stant source of con­tention, the oppor­tu­ni­ty for furtive anguish to some, the oppor­tu­ni­ty for right­eous indig­na­tion for oth­ers. It is a con­cept which is con­spic­u­ous­ly counter to the basic phi­los­o­phy of the Gorean nov­els, but that is rarely under­stood because so few have read all of the books or if they have, placed them in full con­text. Instead, in the way of the insid­i­ous rein­force­ment capa­ble in the cyber­space medi­um of mul­ti­ple rein­force­ment, they learn the idea from many sources. From chats to web-sites to mes­sage boards, it is part of their inter­ac­tive paradigm.

The pejo­ra­tive term for those who vio­late this on-line par­a­digm is ‘switch’, and it does not orig­i­nate from the writ­ings of John Norman. That alone should have sent up a red flag to the inquir­er, and fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion as to where this term comes from. It comes from the Bondage/Discipline/Sado-Masochism venue, BDSM. In BDSM, a switch is some­one who ‘switch­es’ between the roles of dom­i­nance and sub­mis­sion, and BDSM-ori­ent­ed folks con­sid­er that to be nor­mal, ‘alright’. In Gorean thought, how­ev­er, it is seen to demon­strate an inabil­i­ty to find one’s basic nature, either dom­i­nant or sub­mis­sive, and so becomes a vice and a weak­ness. The fal­la­cy is that while Gorean thought includes some BDSM ele­ments, it is not BDSM based. The ear­li­est explor­ers of the on-line Gorean venue came from the BDSM venues, how­ev­er, and with them they brought thi­er BDSM bag­gage and inject­ed it into their con­cep­tions and for­mu­la­tions of Gor. Their BDSM par­a­digms merged, qui­et­ly and almost seam­less­ly into the Gorean cyber­scape, and set the foun­da­tion for after-com­ers to build upon as givens. That most of the after-com­ers also arrived from BDSM back­grounds made these con­t­a­m­i­na­tions to Gorean thought seem quite nat­ur­al and rational.

But they are not accu­rate, accord­ing to the phi­los­o­phy which comes to us through the Gor nov­els by John Norman.

In every woman there is some­thing of the Free Companion and some­thing of the slave girl.

- Priest Kings of Gor, page 205

The Goreans claim that in each woman there is a free com­pan­ion, proud and beau­ti­ful, wor­thy and noble, and in each, too, a slave girl. The com­pan­ion seeks for her com­pan­ion; the slave girl for her Master. It is fur­ther said, that on the couch, the Gorean girl, whether slave or free, who has had the expe­ri­ence, who has tried all loves, begs for a Master.

- Hunters of Gor, page 102

Slavery is cul­tur­al for Goreans. They know it is some­thing a woman can be.

- Explorers of Gor, page 107

The books are very clear that being a Free Woman or a slave is not an absolute, but rather both social states in a fan­ta­sy set­ting, and inter­nal archtypes which exist as poten­tials with­in all women. The Free Woman typ­i­fies an inde­pen­dance that is yet still both depen­dant on men, and sub­ser­viant to the will of men, an essen­tial­ly sub­mis­sive nature that is per­mit­ted to choose whom and when to be sub­mis­sive to. The slave, on the oth­er hand, is ful­ly sub­mis­sive all the time, to all men, and acts from the moti­va­tion of a deep and abid­ing love, total­ly devot­ed to a man. In the books, if a Free Woman over­steps her bounds and attempts to dom­i­nate men, she is put in her place, at thi­er feet or chained to the foot of the bed for the night, as a reminder. In extreme cas­es, it can eas­i­ly result in enslave­ment. The books do not, either through direct philo­soph­i­cal com­men­tary or through para­ble exam­ple, advo­cate that Free Women should dom­i­nate the Free Men of Gor, or behave in the fash­ion of the BDSM Domme. They are not the same, the Free Woman and the Domme, and the BDSM con­cept of the switch who moves between dom­i­nant and sub­mis­sive is not applic­a­ble to Gorean thought.

John Norman gave us a phi­los­o­phy set in a fan­ta­sy melieu, often tight­ly inter­twined into a fan­ta­sy cul­ture, and always shown through the pos­i­tive and nege­tive val­ues attached to the episodes of his sto­ries, para­ble-like, illus­trat­ing that which is advo­cat­ed and that which is not. In those 25 books, it is not uncom­mon for a woman to go from Free Woman sta­tus to slave sta­tus and back to Free Woman again. Indeed, the books say that it is not at all uncommon.

There is no mar­riage, as we know it, on Gor, but there is the insti­tute of the Free Companionship, which is its near­est cor­re­spon­dent. Surprisingly enough, a woman who is bought from her par­ents, for tarns or gold, is regard­ed as a Free Companion, even though she may not have been con­sult­ed in the trans­ac­tion. More com­mend­ably, a free woman may her­self, of her own free will, agree to be such a com­pan­ion. And it is not unusu­al for a mas­ter to free one of his slave girls in order that she may share the full priv­i­leges of a Free Companionship. One may have, at a giv­en time, an indef­i­nite num­ber of slaves, but only one Free Companion. Such rela­tion­ships are not entered into light­ly, and they are nor­mal­ly sun­dered only by death.

- Outlaw of Gor, page 54

The nature of the archtype of the slave is not the same as the usu­al mean­ing of the word ‘slave’ in English usage. It is not sim­ply a woman who is in chains, but rather, a woman who’s very essence is one of love and devo­tion to her man. Her thoughts are not of her­self first, but of him, in all ways and at all times. She is freed from any extra­ne­ous con­cerns or respon­si­bil­i­ties so that she may pur­sue that need with­in her in a total­is­tic fash­ion, as a way of liv­ing her actu­al life. It is for that rea­son that, as shown in book 5, Assassins of Gor, the slave who is bred is not per­mit­ted to so much as hold her new­born baby, it being tak­en away before she can even hear it’s first out­cry of life. Another aspect, or archtype, with­in a woman is that of the Mother, and a woman can­not be absolute­ly devot­ed to both her child and her Master at the same time. A woman who is at a Master’s feet, about to serve his drink, can­not help but be ter­ri­bly dis­tract­ed and dis­traught if she hears, in the next room, a crash­ing noise and the sound of her baby weep­ing. The aspect of the Mother is no less valid with­in women than is the slave, or kaji­ra, or the Free Woman, but they are not the same, and Goreans in the books under­stood this clearly.

The female slave, in her excite­ment and beau­ty, is an embod­i­ment of sen­su­al­i­ty, love, and service

- Vagabonds of Gor, page 260

The love of a slave girl is the deep­est and most pro­found love that any woman can give a man. Love makes a woman a man’s slave, and the whole­ness of that love requires that she be, in truth, his slave. With noth­ing less can she be ful­ly, and insti­tu­tion­al­ly, content.

- Magicians of Gor, page 31

A love slave is still a slave, you see, and per­haps more a slave than any oth­er. She is held in her bondage by the strongest of all bonds, that of love.

- Mercenaries of Gor, page 318

The slave makes no bar­gains; she does not desire small demands to be placed upon her; she does not ask for ease; she asks noth­ing; she gives all; she seeks to love and self­less­ly serve.

- Blood Brothers of Gor, page 139

The slave’s sex­u­al­i­ty is imbed­ded in an entire matrix of obe­di­ence, love and ser­vice. In her heart these things are inex­tri­ca­bly, and del­i­cate­ly and beau­ti­ful­ly intertwined.

- Guardsmen of Gor, page 209

In the course of the pur­suit of the ide­al of the kaji­ra, some­times these basic under­stands are lost in the shuf­fle of the fre­net­ic cyber­space pace, and all too freely inter­min­gled with the taint of the BDSM par­a­digm, where the usage and dis­ci­pline of a sub­mis­sive is a com­mon pub­lic spec­ta­cle and source of pri­ma­ry enter­tain­ment by the BDSM com­mu­ni­ty. This under­mines the com­pre­hen­sion of the val­ue of the kaji­ra, who is not the same as the BDSM sub­mis­sive, but some­thing con­sid­er­ably more.

The most fun­da­men­tal prop­er­ty prized by Goreans in women is their need for love, and their capac­i­ty for love. That is the kind of woman a man wants, ulti­mate­ly, one who is help­less­ly and total­ly love’s cap­tive, in his collar.

- Mercenaries of Gor, page 322

These are not new con­cepts, they are fundi­men­tal human nature, as John Norman is so fond of point­ing out again and again, until it becomes sim­pler to skip over what seems dedun­dant, until the point fades into the back­ground of sta­t­ic and is rarely exam­ined close­ly. These are val­ues, val­ues placed upon human females and they are not depen­dant on cul­ture or envi­ron­ment. They can be found not only in the Gor nov­els, but in real life, in every cul­ture and in every epoch. The major­i­ty of men have always val­ued this love and devo­tion to him, from his woman. Valued it so much that they are will­ing to kill for it, and if need be, die for it.

Swords are often drawn on Gor over women, and par­tic­u­lar­ly over women. Women are prizes, per­fec­tions and trea­sures. It is no won­der than men will fight over them with such ferocity.

- Renegades of Gor, page 297

One of the fan­ta­sy mech­a­nisms which Norman cre­ates in the Gor nov­els is the legal and accep­ti­ble pro­vi­sion for a Free Woman to expe­ri­ence what it is like to give of her­self whol­ly and com­plete­ly, and with­out reser­va­tion, con­cern, or respon­si­bil­i­ty, being total­ly devot­ed to her man. This mech­a­nism is ful­ly con­sis­tant with the philo­soph­i­cal under­stand­ing of the nat­ur­al psy­chol­o­gy of the mul­ti­ple aspects which exist with­in all full-spec­trum women.

Do Masters ever love thi­er slaves?” she asked. “Often,” I said. Indeed, a female slave is the eas­i­est of all women to love; too, of course, she is the most nat­ur­al of all women to love; these things have to do with the equa­tions of nature, in par­tic­u­lar, those of dom­i­nance and sub­mis­sion. To a man a female slave is a dream come true. A free woman, under­stand­ably, can­not begin to com­pete with the female slave for a man’s love. That is per­haps anoth­er rea­son why free women so hate thi­er vul­ner­a­ble, imbond­ed sis­ters. If a free woman would assure her­self her her man’s love she could not do bet­ter than, in effect, become his slave. She can beg of him, if she sens­es in her­self the true bondage of love, an enslave­ment cer­e­mo­ny, in which she pro­claims her­self, and becomes, his slave. In their most secret and inti­mate rela­tions there­after she lives and loves as his slave. If a woman fears to do this, she may, on an exper­i­men­tal basis, resort to a lim­it­ed self-con­tract­ing, in which her doc­u­ments will con­tain stat­ed ter­mi­na­tion dates. Thus, by her own free will, she becomes a slave for a spe­cif­ic peri­od, rang­ing usu­al­ly from an evening to a year. The woman enters into this arrange­ment freely; she can­not, of course, with­draw from it the same way. The rea­son for this is clear. As soon as the words are spo­ken, or her sig­na­ture is placed on the per­tainent doc­u­ment, or doc­u­ments, she is no longer a free per­son. She is then only a slave, an ani­mal, no longer with any legal pow­ers what­so­ev­er. She is, then, until the com­ple­tion of the con­trac­tu­al peri­od, until the expi­ra­tion date of the arrange­ment, total­ly sub­ject to the will of her Master.

- Blood Brothers of Gor, page 101

To fail to deal with and encom­pass the full nature of the woman is not only a dis­ser­vice to her, but a fail­ure to have the entire woman, and there­fore, an incom­plete mas­tery on the part of the man.

It should be under­stood that the Gorean nov­els by John Norman are the defin­i­tive source mate­r­i­al for what might con­sti­tute the Gorean phi­los­o­phy. That is not sub­ject to debate. It is not the same as the lim­it­ed under­stand­ings and par­a­digms that fil­ter through from BDSM venues or D/​s venues, and those who are striv­ing to learn the Gorean phi­los­o­phy are well advised to check thi­er pre­cepts, when in doubt, with the books them­selves. There are no con­tra­dic­tions, only faulty premises.

I wish you well, and a Happy New Year

Always,
LionHeart
Rarius, Civitatis Port Kar, Intended of Nyre
Copyright © December 2000

What did you think of this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *