Nadu’

I don’t know what it is with some of the ‘cha­t­room role­play­ers’, and oth­ers who ‘play’ at Gor, or dis­hon­est­ly ‘pre­tend’ to be Gorean, but for some rea­son, this most basic of all the slave ‘posi­tions’ seems to cause all kinds of prob­lems for them, despite there being numer­ous, clear­ly defined quotes in the books that describe how, in stan­dard ‘nadu’, the slaves hands are to be placed palms down on the thighs.

The girl strug­gled to nadu, kneel­ing back on her heels, her head up, her back straight, the palms of her hands down on her thighs.” Chapter 22, Swordsmen of Gor.
 

In nadu, as the back is straight, the shoul­ders are back, and this accen­tu­ates the delights of the bosom. The widen­ing of the knees sug­gests the vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty of the slave and dis­plays the soft­ness of the open, exposed thighs. The place­ment of the palms down on the thighs, apart and down, to the sides, sug­gests that they will be held as they are, and thus are not per­mit­ted to fend or thwart a caress.” Chapter 22, Swordsmen of Gor.

Nadu,” whis­pered the tav­ern­er, and the girl went to posi­tion, back on heels, knees wide, back straight, the palms of her hands down on her thighs.” Chapter 1, Mariners of Gor.
 
Position!” Instantly, reflex­ive­ly, Iole and Alcinoe, fright­ened, knelt, back on their heels, knees spread, back straight, head up, look­ing ahead, nei­ther to the left or the right, the palms of their hands down, firm­ly, on their thighs.” Chapter 20, Mariners of Gor.
 

She was before me, in posi­tion, kneel­ing, back on her heels, her back straight, her head up, look­ing ahead, the palms of her hands down on her thighs, her knees spread, this mak­ing clear the nature of her bondage.” Chapter 37, Mariners of Gor.

 The only time that a girl kneels palms up in ‘nadu’ is when she is try­ing to silent­ly beg for some­thing. If her pleas are dis­missed, the slave will return to ‘default’ ‘nadu’, ie, palms again down on her thighs.
 
“She knelt in the posi­tion of the Pleasure Slave but her hands on her thighs had uncon­scious­ly, plead­ing­ly, turned their palms to me, and she no longer knelt quite back on her heels. It was as though she begged to be allowed to lift and open her arms and rise and come to my arms. But as I looked upon her stern­ly she turned her palms again to her thighs, knelt back on her heels and dropped her head.…..”  Chapter 28, Priest Kings of Gor.
 
There are a vari­ety of ways in which a plea­sure slave may kneel, but the most com­mon is back on her heels, knees spread, back straight, head up, the palms of her hands down, on her thighs.
Sometimes, when her needs are much­ly upon her, she may kneel much­ly like that, save that her head may be low­ered humbly, dar­ing not to meet the eyes of the mas­ter, and the backs of the hands, not the palms of her hands, may be down on her thighs, which expos­es the del­i­cate palms of the hands to the mas­ter, a love­ly hint of hope and peti­tion.Chapter 3, Swordsmen of Gor.
 
Sometimes a slave in nadu begs, turn­ing her hands about, plac­ing the backs of the hands on the thighs, this expos­ing the soft, del­i­cate, sen­si­tive palms of her hands to the mas­ter. It is a way of sup­pli­cat­ing a caress.” Chapter 1, Mariners of Gor.
 
It should be remem­bered (for those who under­stand Gor) that when a slave is ‘in posi­tion’, she is expect­ed to remain silent. This is why a slave, in order to occai­sion­al­ly attract the atten­tion of a Master, may turn her hands ‘palms up’.
This should NOT be thought of as a reg­u­lar, or com­mon occurence — it isn’t. It should be done only  very rarely — which is why it should NOT be viewed as some kind of sec­ondary, or wide­ly used ‘default’ position.
Slaves are expect­ed to be obe­di­ent, not con­stant­ly attempt­ing to avoid their restric­tions, or lessen their own­ers con­trol over them. Gor is a man’s world.
 
I have nev­er come across any­one who gen­uine­ly lives Gorean, and who has tru­ly read the books that believes ‘nadu’ should be per­formed ‘palms up’ as some form of reg­u­lar­ly used ‘nadu’. Because it isn’t.
To believe oth­er­wise, or to infer that it is only dilutes the bound­aries of Gorean liv­ing, as well as con­fus­ing those new to Gor.
 
Well wish­es,
 
Asmodeus.
 
What did you think of this?

4 Comments

  1. Nyre Civitatus Port Kar

    Unfortunately, in the mix of online inter­ac­tions we are forced to look at crim­i­nals, liars, and thieves. Perhaps that is why so many of us sim­ply live far from it.

    So nice to see you A.

    Do you agree?
    • Greetings Nyre,

      This is a sad fact. My feel­ings are sim­i­lar to your own regard­ing require­ments for those who ‘claim’ to live Gorean. I am copy­ing a com­ment I came across recent­ly that cer­tain­ly sums up MY beliefs regard­ing *unac­cept­able* behaviour:
      ‘If you can not con­trol your­self you have no right to con­trol oth­ers. If you habit­u­al­ly use drugs or alco­hol — i.e. you’re an addict — you are not in con­trol of your­self and you have no right to con­trol others.
      If your earn­ings are exceed­ed by your out­go­ings — i.e. you’re tech­ni­cal­ly bank­rupt — you can not con­trol your spend­ing and you have no right to con­trol others.
      If you are a thief, a liar, a fraud­ster, a rapist, an abuser, a pae­dophile — i.e. you have no moral com­pass nor social respon­si­bil­i­ty — then you can not con­trol your actions and you have no right to con­trol others.’
      Sound require­ments, for those who claim to be ‘Free’.

      I wish you well,
      Asmodeus.

      Do you agree?
  2. AS we have both dis­cov­ered these type of peo­ple are Emotional Predators who spend their time prey­ing on healthy peo­ple. They admit they use emo­tion­al cur­ren­cy to get what they want out of us all. 

    Things like:

    Lovebombing, BreadCrumbing, Ghosting, Gas Lighting, Stalking, Sociopath stalk­ing, Cyber stalk­ing and bul­ly­ing are their trademarks.

    Do you agree?
  3. Yep! Been there, got the tee shirt.
    Happily, these peo­ple CAN be beat­en IF you are will­ing to first accept that the indi­vid­ual con­cerned actu­al­ly is ‘per­son­al­i­ty dis­or­dered’. Many are far too weak to do this — they ‘excuse’ inde­fen­si­ble behav­iour, and claim the preda­tor has sim­ply made a ‘mis­take’, or is ‘mis­un­der­stood’. This helps salve THEIR con­science. It does not stop the preda­tor, it sim­ply ‘enables’ them.
    The tru­ly fright­en­ing thing is, for every ‘preda­tor’, there are sev­er­al to MANY ‘enablers’. They can be iden­ti­fied as the ones to post about how ‘mis­takes’ should be for­giv­en, or posts that actu­al­ly crit­i­cise those who speak out about predators/​abusers — say­ing things should be left in the past, or ‘put to rest’, or ‘we are not tak­ing sides’ etc. They well know about the lies, the fak­ery, and the abus­es — they are sim­ply too weak, or too lone­ly to risk ‘upset­ting’ the preda­tor. That, or they WELL KNOW what the preda­tor is capa­ble of, and are too weak and fright­ened to speak out.

    My advice to any­one, Gorean OR main­stream BDSM would be to avoid ALL of these indi­vid­u­als — they are ALL equal­ly dangerous.

    Do you agree?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *